In introducing the fifth chapter of Being as Communion, Metropolitan Zizioulas points out that Orthodoxy is known for its emphasis on both tradition and worship.
On the one hand, Orthodoxy is known for its devotion to tradition. This makes history acquire decisiveness in the consciousness of the Orthodox Churches, which is thus orientated towards the past with respect and devotion. On the other hand, Orthodoxy is known for the centrality and importance which it attributes to worship in its life and theology, and this leads it to a “theophanic” and in a sense “meta-historical” view of the Church. Deep in these two aspects of Orthodox consciousness lie the seeds of a duality which could easily be turned into a dichotomy. (171)
This duality has been present since the beginning of the Church and is also of relevance to other Churches. And it has particular bearing on our understanding of apostolicity and succession which will be further explored in this chapter.
A vow of conversation 
January 5, 2009 at 8:10 am
Sr. Macrina,
Could you kindly post some more extracts from Met John, if time permits.
It will be interesting to read what he has to say regarding Apostolic Succession.
Suraj Iype
January 5, 2009 at 2:55 pm
Sr. Macrinaa,
It is a great pleasure to read your inspired words. I too have read Being as Communion and as a “Latin” layman I see room for much constructive work in building up the Body of Christ in these end times. Focusing on the Trinity and seeing it from both perspectives, i.e., “breathing with both lungs” we might still be able to coordinate efforts to lift up the Church and witness solidarity in Chirst when it is needed most.
God bless you!
Mike Rizzio
January 5, 2009 at 4:47 pm
Suraj,
I’ve just posted the latest installment – there is hopefully more to follow.
Mike,
Thank you. I agree that it’s an important book although I still need to work through some of its implications.